Ron Torell, Long-Standing Educator and Advocate of
Agriculture
Hay prices are
skyrocketing. In some instances the
price has doubled from what it was just a few short years ago. These escalating prices are primarily due to a
nationwide drought which has reduced supply and increased demand for hay, grain
and standing forage. The price
relationship of protein and energy sources parallel corn and other grain
commodities. Whether you are selling,
purchasing or feeding hay it is important to know what you are dealing
with. The best and most appropriate way
to accomplish this is to compare price per pound of nutrient, not price per ton
of feed. This is when an accurate forage/hay sample and analysis will save/earn
you valuable dollars.
Feeds should not
be compared by cost per ton as this is very misleading. When nutrient shopping
you are normally interested in protein and/or energy. When comparing feeds for
specific nutrients the following guidelines assist in determining the best buy.
Don’t get caught paying high prices for ingredients used as fillers.
First,
determine the dry matter content of the feeds to be compared. Do this by
multiplying 2,000 pounds by the percent of dry matter contained in the feed as
determined by laboratory analysis. This
will give you the total pounds of dry matter in one ton of feed. For example, if a hay sample is 87% dry
matter, multiply 2,000 pounds of as-fed hay by 87% (0.87) dry matter content
which results in 1,740 pounds of actual dry matter.
Next, determine the total pounds of a nutrient in
those 1,740 pounds of dry matter. Do this by multiplying 1,740 pounds by the
percent of the nutrient contained in that feed. For example, if the hay is
analyzed at 19.55% crude protein on a dry matter basis, multiply 1,740 pounds
of dry matter x .1955 (19.55% crude protein) = 340 pounds of crude protein.
This leaves 1,660 pounds of water, other nutrients and filler contained in one
ton of as-fed feed (2,000 pounds – 340 pounds of crude protein = 1,660 pounds).
Finally, determine the cost per pound of actual
protein. Do this by dividing the ton price of as-fed feed (most feeds are
priced as-fed and/or by the ton) by the pounds of actual protein contained in
that ton of as-fed feed ($250/ton ÷ 340 pounds of crude protein = 73.5¢/lb).
In the example above, $250/ton of as-fed hay with a
protein content of 19.55% (dry matter basis) has a price comparison shopping
value of 73.5¢/lb of crude protein. This
same pricing method can be applied when shopping for energy by simply replacing
the protein components of the above formula with the energy numbers.
Protein supplements are perhaps the most difficult to
evaluate because they can differ in the amount of utilizable protein. Feed
supplements such as tubs, liquid and block often contain non-protein nitrogen
(NPN) sources such as urea, biuret and others.
There is also bypass protein and rumen degradable protein. Non-protein nitrogen sources of protein do
not equal natural protein yet many unsuspecting cattlemen purchase these
products assuming they are. The extent
to which NPN is utilized is dependent upon several factors including the energy
content of the ration and the quality of the available forage. The general rule of thumb nutritionists follow
for animals consuming a forage based diet is that no more than 1/3 of the total protein of the ration should be
provided to the animal from non-protein nitrogen sources when adequate energy
is contained in the total ration and/or supplement. It is for this reason when price comparing
feeds to read the feed analysis label and remove the NPN portion of the protein
for price comparison purposes. Recognize
that if a supplement contains no more than 1/3 of the protein content as NPN,
animals will utilize a portion of the NPN as protein.
Factors other than price should also be considered
when shopping for feed ingredients. These include but are not limited to:
•
Convenience/feed-ability;
i.e. feeding blocks or tubs vs. hay or pellets • Transportation costs of getting feed to the ranch. Keep in mind it will probably cost the same to transport a load of good hay as it will a load of junk hay.
• Storage facilities at the ranch
• Cost of feeding the product
• Availability of the product
• Consumption amount required to balance the ration
• Other nutrients required to balance the ration
• Waste
• Salt and mineral content
• Competition when fed (bunk space)
• Opportunity to medicate feed
• Worn and broken teeth on blocks
Even
though the price of feedstuffs has increased significantly the biological nutrient
demand of the bovine remains the same.
The nutrient demand must be met or reduced production will result.
That’s
enough for this month. A special thanks to my wife Jackie for her part in
writing Cow Camp Chatter. As always, if
you would like to discuss this article or simply want to talk cows, do not
hesitate to contact me at 775-385-7665 or rtbulls@frontier.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment